Where'd all the good
people go?
I've been changing
channels
I don't see them on
the TV shows
Where'd all the good
people go?
We got heaps and heaps
of what we sow
This morning, after the result of the US presidential elections
was final, I listened to the victory speech of ‘POTUS’ Barack Obama. In spite of the fact that I am quite realistic
(however, not cynical) on politics and I don’t believe most ‘fairytales’ and empty promises
that are expressed by politicians, I was impressed by Obama’s speech.
The speech of president Obama was typically American with
many displays of affection to his family, his home country and the strenght and
courage of the American people. These are phrases that sound a little bit over-the-top
in European ears; especially for the Dutch, whose national phrase is: ‘please act
normal, than you act sufficiently crazy’.
I am a child of the Calvinistic Dutch culture which prevents me and many
other Dutch people from being too exuberant, except when a football match (soccer)
of the national team is broadcasted on TV.
Further, it was a very positive and powerful speech, with a hand
reached out to the Republican party in order to end the polarisation between
both parties and to solve the challenges that the United States are confronted
with (“the fiscal cliff”). The speech was also full of affection for the American
middle-class that kept the United States running, like the oil in a machine.
Summarized: although it was not my style, I liked it!
I was also quite pleased that Obama had won again; although
his presidency has been disappointing in some aspects, he has done an adequate
job during the last four years, guiding the USA through the crisis. The
introduction of Obamacare was his most important achievement in these eyes and further he didn’t do more
things wrong or less things right than any other president would have done. I was
convinced that Obama did the best he could and that he had been a fine
president in a very difficult economic and social situation. Afterwards I went
to my work, just like any other day…
This afternoon, however, I listened to an interview on the American elections (interview in Dutch) between the distinguished Paul van Liempt of Dutch Business News
Radio BNR (www.bnr.nl) and former United States
correspondent for Dutch national television, the savvy Charles Groenhuijsen.
The interview was an eye-opener to me. It really made me
think about the following question: Where
did all the poor people go?!
What happened to the millions of people in the United States
that are currently beneath the poverty line and who are living from their last cents,
without any chance on improvement of their financial and economical situation.
The poor people that seemed to be left to their lot during this presidential
campaign, in which they were almost totally ignored in spite of their large and
growing numbers, due to the credit crunch.
Here are the most important statements from the interview of
BNR Business Radio with Charles Groenhuijsen, translated to English by me:
Charles Groenhuijsen: “These
elections (like almost any other elections) were about the middle-class, the
backbone of America. People with annual wages between $30,000 and $70,000. What
these elections were not about was the underclass. The poor people, living from
much a lower income than $30,000 annually, who sometimes even live from
foodstamp to foodstamp. What about them during this presidential campaign?!
I’ve witnessed what
happened when handed out foodstamps f.i. became valid on August 1. Then you saw
people queuing up at Walmart on the 31st of July, waiting for the moment the
shop would open again. That is real poverty.
The republicans are completely
ignoring the problem. Romney became the talk of the town in September 2012,
when he talked about the poorest 47% of the Americans: ‘those are people who have
been holding out their hand, while bathing in victimship. People that think
that the government should take care of them and think they are entitled to
healthcare, food, housing etc. To
everything…’
When Barack Obama
would have talked about the underclass and would have started a ‘war on poverty’
in America, he would have been slaughtered by the Republicans. There are many
people that already look at Obama as the American son-in-law of Karl Marx, a
crypto-communist.
The United States are the richest country in
the world, but it has many, many poor people. These people are in a lot of
trouble these days.”
Paul van Liempt: “Will
this group of poor people become bigger? Will the number of handed out foodstamps
grow in the coming years?”
Groenhuijsen: “Hopefully
not. Due to the Democrat majority in the US senate, this group will hopefully
not grow. I hope that the senate and the president will develop a master against
poverty, so this group can become stable or even shrink in the coming years.
When you drive in the
United States, you see the poverty. When Romney would have become president,
nothing would have happened. Everybody knows about this poverty. The US is partially
a third world country. When you leave the roads in the Mid-West or the Southern
states and you turn one or two corners, you see ‘Uncle Tom’s cabin’. Pure
poverty.
This is not a pretty
image. The American mentality is often: ‘those people should try harder and get
their life under control, instead of asking for help from the government.
Everybody has their chance to live the American Dream, but if you fail to do
so, don’t blame the government.’
Poverty is a no-no
during the presidential campaign. All kinds of pundits and focus groups have
decided that talking about poverty would imediately lead to loss of voters.
That is why both presidential candidates stayed far from this topic.”
I am a Dutch person and therefore a European. Europeans are
used to having a social safety-net for people that can’t take care of their own
life anymore, for any reason whatsoever. This safety-net was developed after
the first part of the 20th century, when there were times of great poverty
among Europeans.
People could call this communism, but that is how it works
in Europe. It is something that I’m very proud of, personally.
However, I understand that the USA are a different country
with a different history and a different mindset. I am not the person to judge upon that, as I
know too little from the American history yet.
Still, I hope that the millions of poor Americans will not
stay ‘the elephant in the room’ for president Obama. That he will find a way to
fight poverty and to create new jobs in the creative, strong and dynamic
economy that the United States still is. The latter is something that all
Europeans are very jealous about and that has been the true spirit of America.
I must say that he has done an adequate job during the last four years, guiding the USA through the crisis..I like to read this blog..
ReplyDeleteIt’s important to realize, that of a population of 300 million, only 100 million took the trouble to vote. It’s obvious that poor people are under represented in the US government. It’s a real shame because they could have a real influence on policy. Of the poorest 20%, only 36.4% vote, as opposed to 57% in India. In reality the beacon of democracy in the world is hardly democratic.
ReplyDeleteSee http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voter_turnout#Socio-economic_factors