In general
entrepreneurs have the habit of being overly optimistic, as they are overrating
their chances for success and continuity, while underrating the consequences of
the credit crisis for the whole Euro-zone and The Netherlands. While often
thinking that other companies will suffer from the credit crisis, entrepreneurs
see their own company as immune for the consequences of an enduring period of
austerity.
Governments
on their behalf tried to stem the tides of this crisis by adopting one new
policy after another. Remember QE1+2 and the EU/US alphabet soup of government
measures that should have contained the initial mortgage debt crisis. Most of these
measures didn’t solve the problems, but only postponed the financial/economic
effects of them.
The Dutch
government, for instance, reacted in 2008/2009 to the credit crisis by saving
the Dutch banks, while multiplying the state-debt to 60% of GDP and by
instating the Part-time
Unemployment Benefit (PUB) policy to help companies getting through the
crisis.
The former
can be considered a (very costly) success: of the five Dutch system banks in
the year 2008, ING Groep NV (ING),
ABN Amro, Rabobank, Fortis-bank and SNS
Reaal NV (SR), perhaps only the
Rabobank would have survived without government support
The success
rate of the latter (the PUB) is much more questionnable.The PUB policy was
aimed at helping companies with keeping personnel in service that otherwise would
have been laid off, by taking over 50% of the wage-payments in exchange for an
educational programme.
The thought behind this policy was that Dutch personnel
would be scarce again in a few years when the crisis would be over, due to the
general aging process and especially the coming retirement of the large Dutch
baby-boom generation.
However, in my opinion the
Part-time Unemployment Benefit caused companies to maintain personnel that
should have been laid-off after all. Not laying off personnel maintained at these companies the overcapacity that emerged in 2008, when the credit crisis set in after years of conspicuous consumption. The sad fact is that this operation of
laying off excess personnel started yet in 2011 and will definitely increase in
2012 (see the rest of the article).
But also the opposite happened in Europe : where
governments should have acted decisively and vigorously, they didn’t act at
all.
The Dutch
government and other Euro-zone governments saw the Greek debt problem change
from a smouldering and very well containable campfire into a blazing forest
fire that is spreading throughout the whole Euro-zone, while destroying
everything that comes on its path.
And the
problem of moral hazard in the banking world is far from being solved yet in
the US , the UK and Europe .
To put it even stronger: where the banking world feared a substantial haircut
on Greek debt only one month ago, the problem vanished into thin air at the
last EU summit of December 8. The European taxpayers will keep on footing the
bill for the irresponsible lending behavior of the European banks.
In this
world where there are more opinions than stars in the sky, I just want to show
you the situation in The Netherlands and Europe
as-is: without government propaganda and wishful thinking, but also without an
anti-Euro and anti-EU bias. That the tone of voice of my blog is more bearish
than bullish, is because of the fact that the financial/circumstances have been
more bearish than bullish over the last three years.
The
following collected news messages are from today’s newspaper Het Financieele
Dagblad (www.fd.nl), except for the first
message that is about one week old and comes from a local news site (http://centraal-gelderland.regioinbedrijf.nl/). It shows that the European debt crisis is
gaining momentum currently.
At NXP
Semiconductors (NXPI), the former Philips subsidiary in the Dutch city of Nijmegen , 300 people will
be laid off in the near future. Two of the company’s plants in Nijmegen will be closed by 2013. According to
the producer of semiconductors these factories generate insufficient yields.
NXP is aiming at production in a different plant. This plant produces more
complex semiconductors for a.o. the auto industry.
In 2008 the company already fired 1300 people,
due to a reorganization. Last year, however, new employees were hired again;mainly
temp workers.
Labor Union CNV Professionals is unpleasantly
surprised by the news. The union FNV Bondgenoten also questions the purpose and
necessity of these lay-offs. The unions wanted to have quick consultations with
the NXP management. About 3500 people work at NXP The Netherlands , of which 2000 in Nijmegen .
300 jobs
lost and counting…
The ICT service company Logica PLC (LOG) scraps 450-550 jobs in The Netherlands and Belgium , after it sees market
circumstances deteriorate. The company expects in 2012 a return to
profitability in the Benelux (Belgium ,
Netherlands
and Luxemburg).
The British-Dutch company Logica stated this on
Wednesday December 14 in a intermediate press release, where it speaks of
deteriorating market circumstances and customers reducing assignments. In
reaction to this news the share dropped by 10.9% after 30 minutes of trading
The company stated that it will speed up an
earlier announced reorganization and will scrap a total of 1300 jobs; most in
The Netherlands and Belgium .
Besides that, it will abolish half of its Commercial Real Estate in these
countries.
575 jobs
lost and counting (presuming an equal split in job losses between The
Netherlands and Belgium )…
The Vlissingen , Zeeland-based, Dutch aluminium
producer Zalco has defaulted, causing 600 employees to lose their jobs.
The company that already had been
in big financial trouble for a few years, was declared bankrupt yesterday by a
judge at the District Court in Middelburg. At Zalco work 480 people with fixed
contracts and 130 temp workers. The personnel have been informed by the
management. The company already had to scrap 140 jobs in 2008 and made use of
the Part-time Unemployment Benefit (PUB) policy in 2009.
1175 jobs lost and counting… This example proves once again that the PUB
only ‘helped’ companies to postpone the
inevitable and weakened these companies in the process.
The Eindhoven-based Dutch truck
manufacturer DAF (a subsidiary of US-based truck company PACCAR (PCAR)) reduces
once again production volumes. A few hundred temp workers lose their jobs as a
consequence.
This was announced by DAF in an
internal memo to the personnel. According to CEO Harrie Schippers of DAF, many
transporting companies postpone the purchase of new trucks, due to the
uncertain economic circumstances and the Euro-crisis. This results in a much lower demand for trucks.
How the production at DAF will
develop, depends on the market demand, according to the management. ‘ The
peculiar circumstance is that shipping activities are still at a very high
level in Europe ’, according to Schippers in
his memo to the personnel. ‘ Trucks are still sold, but many transporting
companies are restrained to make large investments’.
At the end of 2008, DAF had to
deal with a dropping demand, as a consequence of the credit crisis. Sales
dropped sharply during these months and the whole 2009, but in 2010 – after
scrapping a number of jobs and the introduction of the Part-time Unemployment
Benefit(PUB) – an economic recovery followed. The truck manufacturer now feels
once again the consequences of the crisis.
1375
jobs lost and counting. Once again there is a dubious role for the PUB, as it
helped to maintain a situation of overcapacity in the Dutch manufacturing
industry.
And
these were only the Dutch companies that are currently reducing their excess
personnel. Also bricks-and-mortar travel agent Thomas Cook Group PLC (TCG) and France-based manufacturer of
nuclear power plants Areva SA (AREVA) announced
lay-offs of personnel today.
The reasons for these companies firing people, however, have less to do with the credit crisis than with a changing business environment for both companies. Thomas Cook definitely seems to
lose the battle against the online travel agents and Areva still suffers
heavily from the reduced interest for nuclear energy since the Fukushima catastrophy.
Still,
in my opinion and that of many others, the 2010 economic recovery was totally
artificial. None of the structural problems (overcapacity(!)) were solved and
governments only dropped billions of Euro’s and Dollars into the economy,
trying to spur it into recovery.
Now,
due to the euro-crisis, the economic effects of this helicopter-drop of money
have waned and the overcapacity is still present at the various manufacturers.
Therefore these companies start to reduce their production capacity after all;
sometimes voluntarily, but mostly out of necessity.
And
I don’t expect a quick recovery this time, as there still seems to be a lot of
overcapacity within Europe and it is very
doubtful whether demand will return soon to 2006-levels. One thing is certain;
the demand from the PIIGS-countries is not likely to return to 2006-levels soon
and the same might apply to consumption in the stronger Euro-countries.
Therefore expect much more bad news in the coming months.
No comments:
Post a Comment