But the devil caught
hold of my soul
and a voice called out
shoot!
During the last months, the Euribor group (i.e. European
Interbank Offered Rate) – the pan-European counterpart of the worldwide
accepted Libor (London Interbank Offered Rate) interest rate – suffered from an
unexplained exodus of banks that officially settled the Euribor rate until recently.
From the original 44 banks in 2012, only 39 are left now and
another candidate for leaving the Euribor group might be ahead. The following banks have already left the Euribor
settlement group: Rabobank,
Raiffeisenbank Austria AG, Landesbank Bayern (Bavaria), Citigroup inc. and DekaBank Group. The Austrian lender Erste
Group Bank AG is currently reviewing its options.
This exodus among the Euribor banks cannot be seen separated
from the Liborgate investigation that is hanging above the market like Damocles’
sword. Barclays PLC in the United
Kingdom and UBS AG in Switzerland already admitted last year having rigged the
Libor rate.
Also the Dutch Rabobank – one of the five
banks now leaving the Euribor group- admitted last year that a few members of
its personnel were involved in the Libor-manipulation, a fact for which they
were fired a few years ago.
The Rabobank stated that it left the Euribor-group
for business-economical reasons; an explanation that must be taken with a pinch
(or two) of salt unfortunately.
In my humble opinion, Rabobank – and with them some other banks, I presume – is afraid
that the investigations into Libor will be stretched out to the Euribor group
as well.
Perhaps, in a transparent attempt to escape the wrath of the
European and United States supervisors, these banks toss the white flag and
call it a day within the Euribor group, in order to cut their losses and do anything
possible in damage control. This is the reason that I suspect more banks to
follow their example.
The Wall Street Journal wrote on this developing story:
Worries are mounting
about one of Europe's benchmark interest rates, after another bank on Wednesday
decided to abandon the panel that sets the rate.
In the past four
business days, three European banks have said they will stop providing data to
help set the euro interbank offered rate, or Euribor, which serves as the basis
for interest rates on trillions of euros in loans and other financial
contracts. The latest, on Wednesday, was Austria's Raiffeisen Bank
International RBI.VI +0.07% AG. Another Austrian lender, Erste Group Bank AG,
EBS.VI +0.25% said Tuesday that it is reviewing its options. The departures
leave 39 banks on the panel, from a peak of 44 in 2012.
"I am very
concerned with the situation, absolutely. This is a serious situation,"
said Cedric Quéméner, a director of Euribor-EBF, whose members in the European
Banking Federation set Euribor.
"Euribor needs to
be reformed and quickly. Banks leaving set a bad example for other contributing
banks," Mr. Quéméner said in an interview. "If we have more banks
leaving, we may have no more Euribor."
Like its
more-prominent cousin Libor—the London interbank offered rate—Euribor has come
under scrutiny about whether banks have manipulated the rate. Barclays BARC.LN
+1.71% PLC and UBS AG admitted last year that employees tried to manipulate
Libor. The European Union is nearing completion of an investigation into
potential collusive activity by banks in the setting of Euribor.
Euribor was set up by
the European Banking Federation in 1999 to establish a new interbank reference
rate within what is now the 17-country currency union. In addition to serving
as a benchmark for trillions of euros in savings and loans, the European
Central Bank also uses it as a factor in its monetary-policy decisions. Many
mortgages across Europe track Euribor rather than the ECB benchmark rate.
The three banks that
have recently left the rate-setting panel have pointed to business reasons like
shifting internal priorities and what they describe as a shrinking in the
bank-to-bank lending market as reasons for their departure.
Last Friday,
Bayerische Landesbank and Rabobank both pulled out. Erste Group Bank said
Tuesday it is also reviewing its options for its membership. Citigroup Inc. C
-1.14% and Germany's DekaBank Group withdrew from the Euribor panel in 2012.
Mr. Quéméner said banks "normally" have to give around 10 days'
notice before they stop quoting rates.
"As of this
moment there are no other banks looking to leave the Euribor panel," he
said.
Although the Euribor rate is less important from a global
point of view, it is much harder to rig than the Libor rate. The latter rate is
settled by only 18 banks, while the former had 44 banks to settle the rate in
2012 and now still consists of 39 banks. This is a much larger group of banks,
making conspiracies between groups of banks much harder and diminishing the influence of one single
bank on the result of the rate settlement process.
However, it is of course more than just a wild presumption that the Euribor
rate is rigged too. Why would this rigging be exclusively the domain of the
Libor-rate?! The worldwide banking industry has shown over the last decades
that it plays for keeps: within the rules and when the rules were too
restrictive, even outside those rules. Besides that, many of the banks that are
involved in settling the Libor-rate, are also involved in settling the Euribor
rate.
in order to muck out the dirty stables called Libor and Euribor, the
international supervisors might use any means possible to get their grasp on
the perpetrators among the international banks.
In the case that other banks would get caught in rigging the Libor and/or
Euribor rates, this will presumably lead to penalties in the billions of dollars for the
banks and – on top of that – many years of imprisonment for the executive
managers of these banks.
In that case, the battle between the international supervisors and the
executive managers of the global system banks would approach Genesis’ Battle of
Epping Forest much closer than many bankers would like for their good health.
No comments:
Post a Comment