The Netherlands is – by itself – a very clean and
uncorrupted country. In 2011, Transparency International put the country at the seventh spot of least
corrupted countries in the world. Still, corruption is a multi-headed beast
and even the cleanest country cannot rest on its laurels, thinking ‘things like
corruption don’t happen here’.
Especially in economically difficult times, the business
world plays for keeps and tries to increase its influence: legally, through clever
lobby-programmes, but sometimes at or even over the brink of legality.
In 2012, there is a growing number of incidents, concerning
local and even national members of the VVD: the liberal-conservative Dutch
party that has very warm feelings for entrepreneurs and entrepreneurship and
that has many entrepreneurs among its representatives.
A few months ago, I wrote upon the criminal investigation
that had been started against VVD delegate for the province Noord-Holland, Ton
Hooijmaijers on multiple charges of bribery, forgery and
money laundering.
In the meantime, the
VVD Senator (member of the First Chamber of Parliament), Roermond alderman and former
delegate for the province Limburg, Jos van Rey has become subject of a criminal investigation too. I didn’t report upon this
investigation through this blog, as I had other priorities at the time. Still,
I followed this case quite closely.
Van Rey is currently under suspicion of leaking classified
information, concerning the nomination process for the mayorship of Roermond. This
information – which specific questions would be asked during the job interview
for the position of mayor – had been leaked to a VVD candidate for this position.
That’s not all: Van Rey is also under suspicion of being
bribed by a real estate project developer in Limburg, Piet van Pol. Although
not all details have been disclosed yet, it is at least clear that Van Rey has
borrowed Van Pol’s royal mediterranian holiday residence for free on multiple
occasions. Besides that, it seems plausible that Van Rey also directly received bribe money through Liba
Adviesbureau, a consulting company associated to his children. Van Rey is
currently accused of favouring Van Pol at a number of building projects.
Today, the name Van Pol also popped up in an investigation by
Dutch newspaper NRC (www.nrc.nl) against
VVD-member in the Second Chamber of Parliament Karin Straus and VVD-State
Secretary of Finance Frans Weekers.
Here are the pertinent snips of this article:
The Limburg’ Member of
Parliament Karin Straus had her September, 2012 election campaign financed by Piet
van Pol, a project developer from Roermond, who is currently under suspicion of
bribery. When Straus accepted Van Pol’s support, he had already been
discredited for over a year, due to his mixed-up interests with VVD-senator and
Roermond alderman Jos van Rey.
VVD Chief Whip (i.e.
fraction leader) Halbe Zijlstra qualified her modus operandi as ‘clumsy’, after
a thorough conversation with Karin Straus. The controversial project developer
Van Pol, has also been involved in the election campaigns of Jos van Rey and
Finance State Secretary Frans Weekers (VVD).
The public prosecution
is currently investigating Van Rey and Van Pol. Van Rey would have favored his
friend Van Pol as an alderman. On October 19, the Governmental Investigation Department (in Dutch 'Rijksrecherche') has searched the houses of the politician and his children. Three days later
Van Rey abandoned his political functions.
Van Pol was one of the
financiers of Liba Adviesbureau, a consulting bureau, owned by the children of
Jos van Rey. Liba received more payments from enterprises with whom Van Rey had
been doing business as an alderman.
The €15,000 campaign
of Karin Straus has reputedly been supported financially by Liba. Besides that,
Straus has accepted that Van Pol donated another €1000 for her campaign. This has
happened after an investigation committee had concluded that Van Pol and Van Rey
had been mixing up interests.
Also Finance State
Secretary Frans Weekers, ex-employee of Van Rey, had his election campaign
partially sponsored by Van Pol, this autumn. This happened via Van Rey, who
rented a billboard alongside the A79 motorway at a token price from a company, belonging
to Van Pol.
The remainder of the NRC article informs the audience upon a
private consultancy firm, established by Straus, which she ‘forgot’ to report
to the Public Register of Additional Jobs for Members of Parliament. She also
forgot to mention that she did a one-off paid job for the Limburg’ chemical company
DSM through this private consultancy firm, at the time that she was already an MP.
I’m not in favor of starting a witch hunt against the VVD.
Most local and national VVD representatives are very honorable men and women.
Besides that, the VVD is not the only party whose representatives sometimes make
a faux pas (infringement of the rules) in local or national politics. On the
other hand: the iconization of entrepreneurs within the VVD party can cause VVD
representatives to think that they should act as entrepreneurs in their public
functions too. This is not true, however.
Public representatives must remember that they act on the behalf of all
Dutch and/or local citizens and that they do so while being paid with tax money.
These people are under the looking glass and for a very good reason.
Politicians must be not for sale and must avoid any matter that could spread
doubt about their credibility and loyalty to the Dutch citizens.
The number of incidents involving VVD party-members during
the last months and especially the seriousness of the accusations against them,
should be a cause for serious reflection and investigation within the party.
Otherwise the VVD might lose its credibility as a serious and incorruptable
political party.
If incidents like these happen too often, The Netherlands
might even lose its seventh spot on the TI list of incorruptable countries in the near
future. That would be a real shame.
No comments:
Post a Comment