Search This Blog

Monday, 27 June 2011

China loves Europe, but this love comes at a price! What the price will be, the future will learn us.

Prime Minister Wen Jiabao of China is on a trip to Europe this week. He visited Hungary (current holder of the EU Presidency) and the United Kingdom this weekend and he will visit Germany in the coming days. Wen spoke a.o. with British Prime-Minister David Cameron and representatives of the Hungarian government.

Although the details of these conversations are not disclosed totally, we can figure out that China will act as a ‘friend’ to Europe, but that this friendship will not be for free.

To get a picture of what this friendship might cost Europe, I want to remind you of one of my earlier articles: Friend or foe: why Europe and the USA should beware of the Chinese friendship: 

I am not so sure that China is not trying to come to Europe as a Trojan Horse. Of course it is a defensible strategy when you try to secure your sales channels and supply lines with your own workers through your own ports and highways. 

But looking at the wise words of Sun Tsu and Confucius on top of this article it is wise to remember: 

  • It is the best thing to take over your enemy’s country whole and intact
  • Ignorance is the night of the mind, but a night without moon and stars 
So, in my opinion, it is a good thing if we don’t erect trade barriers towards China. NOBODY is waiting for a trade war with the most patient people in the world. But let’s not be naïve over the intentions of the Chinese people in Europe and let’s not be too glad when our Chinese “friend” with the virtually endless supply of money is willing to help us in our darkest hour. It can be the kind of friend that makes enemies unnecessary.
The German newspaper Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (www.faz.net) reported on June 26 on the Chinese intentions with Germany and the other European countries. The article is written in the German language and translated by me. As the article is an absolute must-read, here is an almost complete version of it:
Next week in Berlin, the first government talks take place. Such a common cabinet meeting won’t stop China. The country expects compensation for the support of the Euro.
Because of the weakened European Union, China is looking for closer relations with Germany. Both countries have the strongest economies of their part of the earth, the strongest exports positions in the world and the second and fourth biggest home economies. Last Friday, Prime Minister Wen Jiaboa started a trip to Europe, that brought him to Hungary and the UK and will bring him to Germany on Monday and Tuesday. 

In Berlin, the first Chinese-Germany government consultations will take place. This is a  unique event, as China didn’t have these meetings with other countries. It emphasizes the importance of the Chinese-Germany relations fir Beijing. 
The conversations with China, that feature 24 Ministers of both countries, focus on the political, economic and technological cooperation. Also a number of economic treaties is signed, for instance on an intended investment of €860 mln from BASF in the city Chongqing. Airbus is hoping to sell dozens of new airplanes to China, but this is not yet certain. China is using this Airbus order as leverage, aiming to be excluded from the EU Emissions trades, that will shortly include air traffic.

Also new economic industries are discussed. The Chinese government also wants to decide on the structural reforms of German companies. In the five year-plan up to 2015, the country wants to evolve from mass exports with little added value, to new techniques, quality goods and services. An important role play industries where German providers are very strong: renewable energy production, energy-efficient construction, environmental protection, water and waste management. Also a common platform for electromobility should be developed; people in Chongqing get special trainings on this topic. 

The German companies will get a special Chinese bureau where difficulties among patent violations can be solved. China feels very close to Germany, as both countries suffer from US attacks on their trade surplusses.
The Chinese government sees Angela Merkel as a kind of inofficial chairman of the EU. The German government on their side, are aware not to give in to Chinese flattering, as it doesn’t want to additionally weaken the European Union. Wen Jiabao, however, is intending once more to ask for the release of the EU weapons embargo and for the recognization of China as a market economy. The latter would make it harder for Europe to ask for legal settlement at the WHO in case of anti-dumping cases. In July, 2010, Angela Merkel denied both Chinese desires and since then the Chinese economy hasn’t turned more into an open market, according to investors. The American and European Chambers of Commerce are very dissatisfied that foreign companies have hardly access to public tenders in China and that these companies are growingly harmed by the Chinese bureaucracy. According to the European Commissioner for trade, China has only met one of five conditions for obtaining the free market status. At the other four conditions, steps have been made.
China sees itself in a stronger negotiating position, as the EU is more and more dependent on the Far East. China rose to be the fifth-largest foreign investor during the crisis and buys more and more in Europe; for instance German computer manufacturer Medion. Even more impressive is the fact that China has the Euro on a leash. The country has the largest currency reserves in the world; more than $3 trillion. The larger part of this is invested in the dollar, but increasing parts are invested in the Euro. China signed Greek sovereigns during the debt crisis and invested also heavily in Ireland and the Iberian peninsula. For these investments, the Chinese government expects compensations: quid pro quo. A Chinese spokesman stated before the trip started: “China is willing to additionally help Europe”.
The EU is the most important trade partner for China; even before the US. Especially because of the exchange between Germany and China. This exchange between these countries is one third of the total volume with the EU and is almost as big as the exchange between China and Great Britain, France and Italy combined. German imports from China soared by 35% and exports even soared by 44%. 
The German Industrial and Commerce Chamber DIHK expects China to be Germany’s most important trade partner in 2012. This is already true for imports; for exports China is Germany’s number seven. For China, Germany is their number five trade partner.
China is the most important host for German economic activities, outside the home country. More than 5000 German-financed companies and 200,000 employees are involved there. The direct investments are indeed not more than 1% of all money flows that exceed $106 bln. However, most money earned by German companies is reinvested in China and is therefore not visible in statistics.
The fact with China was, is and will be the coming years, that the country is not a democracy and does not have an open economy with fair chances for all competitors: domestic and foreign. Besides that, I am not so sure that the Chinese intentions for the western world are as friendly as their smile. If the love for their Chinese citizens is already not very big in some cases (‘the dissidents’), you can imagine that the true love for Europe is even smaller. That should not prevent the European countries from doing business with China, but it should prevent them from becoming (too) dependent on China.

On this European dependency on China the following article at Bloomberg, of which I quote the pertinent snips:
Premier Wen Jiabao said China will keep investing in Europe’s sovereign bond market, providing a vote of confidence in the region roiled by the debt crisis.
“China has actually increased the purchase of government bonds of some European countries, and we haven’t cut back on our euro holdings,” Wen told the British Broadcasting Corp. yesterday in an interview. These acts “show our confidence in the economies of Europe and the euro-zone.”

Wen, whose country’s $3 trillion of currency reserves are the world’s largest, is today due to meet with U.K. Prime Minister David Cameron in London as European policy makers enter another week of talks on how Greece can avoid default. Greek lawmakers vote this week on an austerity package needed to secure more international aid, while governments elsewhere on the continent are negotiating with banks over how they can assist the country.

China’s leader is visiting Europe as investors signal renewed concern in the ability of euro-region nations to beat the debt crisis that has occupied the minds of officials for more than a year. European stocks fell for an eighth week last week, the longest stretch of losses since 1998, and the euro weakened to a record against the Swiss franc amid speculation Greece won’t be able to pay its bills.
“China is ready to work with Europe to share opportunities, cope with challenges and achieve common development, and to make unremitting efforts for stable development of the world economy and an in-depth development of China-Europe ties,” China’s state-run Xinhua news agency cited Wen as saying June 25.

This is not the first time Wen has expressed support for Europe’s cash-strapped nations. He said in April that China would invest in Spain’s bonds and savings bank industry and that it would continue buying public debt.
Wen’s visit will help “convince the market that China will provide a contagion back-stop” and so lend support to the euro, Douglas Borthwick, head of foreign-exchange trading at Stamford, Connecticut-based Faros Trading, said in a June 20 report.

China is playing a “white knight” role in assisting Europe and buying itself goodwill that will enable it to purchase more sensitive European assets such as technology companies, according to Faros Trading. The Asian country’s purchases of euro-denominated debt also helps diversify its reserves away from dollars, it said.

Today’s talks in London will be focused on trade as the U.K. government seeks to boost commerce with China to $100 billion by 2015, Cameron’s office said in a statement. Downing Street also said the two countries are set to make it easier for British businesses to branch out beyond Beijing and Shanghai and that China will again open its market to U.K. poultry exports.
The Financial times also reports on the visit of Wen Jiabao to Europe.  

Wen Jiabao, China’s prime minister, arrives in Europe for a visit to Britain and Germany, at a time when the European Union is in crisis and China is booming. Neither the British nor German governments need any reminding of China’s importance to their economic prospects. Its demand for sophisticated machine tools has been a big part of Germany’s recent economic success. In Britain, Mr Wen, will go to Birmingham to visit the city’s famous Longbridge car plant, now owned by Shanghai Automotive, and will inspect a new MG sports car.
It is natural and important that the emphasis during Mr Wen’s visit should be on the benefits of co-operation between Europe and China. The future of both international politics and economics will turn on whether a rising China can sustain a co-operative relationship with the western world.
For that to happen, however, both the Chinese and the Europeans must engage with the difficult issues. The MG plant may be an example of a mutually beneficial project. But, as China looks for investment opportunities overseas, other projects may be less welcome – particularly if they involve state-owned companies which get cheap state funding or whose ownership is untransparent. Huawei, a telecoms company with global ambitions, has caused concern over its alleged links – which it denies – to the Chinese military. 
Both sides have valid points to make. The Chinese rightly warn against protectionism wrapped in a national-security flag. But the Europeans should remind Mr Wen that Chinese companies may be viewed with a degree of suspicion given the volume of cybercrime emanating from China. The treatment of western investors in China over intellectual property also needs to improve.

It is understandable that the cash-strapped European countries are happy with ‘white knight’ China. This knight in shining armour comes with its pockets filled to the brim with dollars and Euro’s, that it is happy to spend on all European countries in distress.

However, this white knight comes with a price, according to Bloomberg: buying itself goodwill that will enable it to purchase more sensitive European assets such as technology companies. The European countries should consider very well if this is a price they are willing to pay, as it is defense and industrial technology that often distinguishes European and American companies from their Chinese counterparts. Losing the exclusive usage of their leading technology might mean that European and American companies lose the edge to China.

The Financial Times is right when they state that ‘Chinese companies may be viewed with a degree of suspicion’.

So let us look at the Chinese Dragon very carefully, before it blows us away. Because even a dragon with a smile, is still a dragon. And Europe has – in spite of all current financial difficulties – still a lot to lose.

Friday, 24 June 2011

Royal Philips NV: Does a new CEO in his rookie year always generate losses and dropping stockprices for Philips?

Philips (PHG) is a multinational company in lighting, healthcare and consumer electronics from The Netherlands, that you can best compare with a phoenix: every time you think the company is finished, it reinvents itself and returns from its ashes to grow bigger and stronger again.
This week was again a memorable week for the company (see chart): after an already miserable year-to-date with the stock dropping from its peak rate $34.08 on January 18th to $25.04 on June 15th, the stock dropped on June 22 to $22.60 from $26.05 after a serious profit warning, only to meander the rest of the week between $23 and $23.60.

(Philips stock rates Year-to-Date: http://www.reuters.com/)
Click to enlarge
To understand the dynamics behind this company, you have to know about its history:

The in Eindhoven, The Netherlands based company Philips started in the 19th century as a factory in lightbulbs. It turned in a number of years into a behemoth with – in its heyday – 350,000 employees (1970), that produced everything electrical and electronical: from washing machines to X-ray machines, electric shavers and halogen lightbulbs. Philips NatLab (physics laboratory) has been one of the best research centers in the world, with countless inventions and products of fundamental research.Also it has been the parent company of famous startups, like ASML (wafer machines for the chips industry), and NXP (microprocessors), both state-of-the-art companies.
Besides that, it owned an extremely succesful record label (Polygram), a cable television company  (UPC), a number of retail chains in Europe and the US and participations and joint-ventures in almost every important electronics brand in Europe and The Far East. And it was the inventor of the compact cassette, the CD and the DVD.
Till so far the good news on this truly multinational company.
The bad news is that the company is an investor’s worst nightmare. Cor Boonstra, CEO of the company from 1996-2001 called the organization structure in 1996: “a plate of spaghetti”. And that was after Operation Centurion, the worldwide reorganization of Philips, started by previous CEO Jan Timmer, had ‘finished’.  And also after the discharge of ten thousands of ‘redundant’ employees and some drastic changes in the organization structure.
The problem was that the company was so big, versatile and sluggish, operated in so many countries and had an organization that was so complex, that it could be compared with a super tanker where the captain is frantically turning the steering rudder: nothing happens… Trying to change the company seems like pulling on a dead horse. If you look over the last 40 years, the numbers of reorganizations, strategic reorientations and buy-outs of company parts is truly countless. And for a few exceptions, nothing seems to have the desired effect.
But just when you think there is no strategy left, the product lines are hopeless, there is no subsidiary left to sell and the company has finally sung its swansong, other parts of the company become successful again and grow enormously, thus saving the company from bankruptcy.
It is a disaster for the long-term investor to invest in this extremely market-sensitive, incomprehensable and opaque company.
However, there is one rule-of-thumb that you can follow, if you look at the long-term stats: the new CEO-effect.
In the last full working year of a Philips CEO, the company almost always shows good profits and a high stock price. In the first year of the new CEO the company often reports (record) losses and the stock price drops (see chart).
(The CEO-effect _Philips stock rates 20Y: www.reuters.com)
Click to enlarge

Of course there is no guarantee that this is a winning strategy. Especially after the crash of the dotcom bubble and in 2008, the stock got hammered. But it seems more than a coindicental pattern, that the last full year of the old CEO of Philips is always successful if you look at the stock price, while the next year is a year with reported losses and falling stock prices.
So from that point-of-view, this week’s profit warning and stock price drops didn’t come as a real surprise.

Thursday, 23 June 2011

An SMS from Ernst (10): Short Messages Service

It is again time for my SMS: short messages service. There was really a tidal wave of economic news in The Netherlands and to be frank: most of it was bad.

Only the most optimistic Dutch Prime Minister or owner of an ICT company can state without blinking ‘that the economic crisis is over and the only way is up’. However, the people that read my blog or other economic blogs (see the list in my profile for good ones) know that this is far from the truth.

Here is my choice of the economic news of the last days

Saab: the wages can’t be paid anymore

The situation around the Swedish, Dutch-owned car manufacturer SAAB is deteriorating at a blistering speed. After the production did stop and hasn’t yet started again, the company comes more and more in dire straits. The Dutch Business News Radio station (www.bnr.nl) reports in a short, but tale-telling message (link in Dutch):

The current inability of SAAB to pay out the monthly wages to its workers, can lead to the Swedish unions filing for bankruptcy for the Swedish car brand. SAAB has presumably one week to set the wage payments straight, before real danger of bankruptcy looms.
The main labor union IF Metall stated on Thursday June 23rd, that it prepares an urgent request for payment. As soon as this claim is received by the car manufacturer, the company has seven days to react and resume wage payments. “When it remains quiet, we will seriously consider filing for bankruptcy”, according to a spokesman of the union.
Saab is part of the Dutch company “Swedish Automobile”
Two months ago, on April 15th , I predicted in my article: Saab: saving Swedish airplane company…:

·    In the current tempo Saab will default within 3 months, unless a miracle happens.
·   Victor Müller will even have to do his very best to stay out of trouble, as the Swedish government might want to have his head after the default of Saab
·    Spyker, the Dutch sportscar brand co-founded by Victor Müller will also cease to exist
·   The €400 mln from the EIB will be vanished to the last cent without a trace.
I think that the first bullet is almost a dead-cert now; well within three months. The other bullets will also be true, I’m afraid. That is not something I pride myself on, but in this case it was so obvious that the company needed nothing less than a miracle to survive. And I’m afraid that miracles don’t happen.

Rising unemployment

The Dutch statistics bureau CBS (www.cbs.nl) came with the latest unemployment and job figures:

Unemployment figure up by 8000 in May
•Unemployment stays around 400,000
•UWV registers fewer job seekers and unemployment benefits
In May 2011 the seasonally adjusted unemployment rate reached 400,000. This equals 5.1 percent of the labour force. The number of unemployed people increased in May according to the latest figures by Statistics Netherlands.
UWV figures show that the number of job seekers as well as the number of unemployment benefits are decreasing.

Unemployment around 400,000
The seasonally adjusted unemployment rate increased by 8000 in May 2011. In the last six months the unemployment figure stayed around 400,000.
In 2010 unemployment fell almost continuously.
The increase in the number of unemployed in May is entirely attributable to women. It is the first time in 2011 that unemployment among women actually increased. The number of unemployed men ceased to fall at the start of the year.

•Employment increased by 34,000 jobs in first quarter from same period in 2010
•Employment marginally down relative to fourth quarter 2010
•Actual wage increase considerably higher than CAO wage increase
In the first quarter of 2011, the number of jobs of employees grew by 34,000 relative to the first quarter of 2010, but Statistics Netherlands reports that employment adjusted for seasonal variation declined by 7000 compared to the fourth quarter of 2010.

The recent job growth is mainly found in the sectors health care and business services, but job growth in the care sector (+ 34,000) is lower than in prior quarters. In the sector business services, temp agencies contributed most to employment with 21,000 extra jobs.

Adjusted for seasonal variation, the number of jobs fell by 7,000 (0.1 percent) compared to the fourth quarter of 2010. After three quarters of employment growth, this is the first quarter-on-quarter contraction. Employment dropped in construction, public administration and in culture, recreation and other services. Sustained job growth was recorded in the care sector, though the growth rate slowed down relative to the previous quarters.

The Netherland still has an extremely low unemployment rate, compared to other countries, although there is substantial hidden unemployment in it.

And although the unemployment figures still look fabulous to other people’s eyes, from a Dutch point of view, these figures are therefore not very good.

The unemployment rose especially among women and also the number of jobs decreased since the last quarter, although there was an increase year-over-year.

What is puzzling for me, is that the job rises were in the business services/temp services and healthcare industry: both parts of the labor market where especially women are active. You would expect the women’s unemployment to decline, instead of having it rising. I can’t explain that.

It makes total sense to me that Employment dropped in construction, public administration and in culture, recreation and other services:

The construction industry is still a mess with the structural vacation in CRE and the locked-up housing market in The Netherlands.

With the cutbacks in the national and local civil services and the cutbacks in culture subsidies, the decline of the number of jobs in those industries is what you would expect. Recreation is also an industry that is sensitive for the socionomic mood. The consumer confidence declined, according to the CBS. This could be an important factor for the direction that economic growth will take in The Netherlands.

Dutch consumers more pessimistic about future economy

Dutch consumers were far more negative about the economic situation in June than in May, but their willingness to buy improved. Overall, the mood among consumers remained about as negative as in May. The consumer confidence indicator fell 1 point to -11.

Confidence in the economic situation in the next twelve months was dented as the component indicator slumped 10 points. Consumers’ opinions on the economic climate over the past twelve months was also more negative, but to a lesser extent. As a result, the component indicator economic climate dropped 7 points to -16.

The decline in confidence regarding the economic climate was partly offset by an improvement in consumers’ opinions with respect to their own financial situation. Consumers were obviously less negative about their financial situation in the past twelve months than in May.
Chart on consumer optimism / source: www.cbs.nl

With regards to their own financial situation, it makes sense that the Dutch people are more confident. With salaries rising (full text can be found by clicking on the link for the CBS job report) the financial situation of the Dutch people improves. But everybody knows that the ‘elephant in the room’ is the European sovereign crisis. And that won’t go away very soon. That explains the rising pessimism under the Dutch consumers, in spite of their improved financial situation.

Housing prices down again

The news that was as predictable as rain showers during summer in The Netherlands, was about the Dutch housing market. Prices fall and the market remains locked:
Prices of existing owner-occupied houses were on average 1.8 percent lower in May 2011 than in May 2010. According to the price index of existing residential property – a joint publication by Statistics Netherlands and the Land Registry Office – the price drop was just below the one in April, when prices were 2.1 percent down on one year previously.

All types of dwellings were cheaper in May 2011 than in May 2010. Prices of detached houses dropped most (2.2 percent). With 0.9 percent, corner houses showed the smallest price drop.
Prices fell in all provinces, except in Utrecht and Groningen. With 4.4 percent, residential property prices declined most in Friesland. Prices in Utrecht and Groningen were respectively 0.5 and 0.3 percent up on one year previously.

Prices of existing residential property units dropped by 0.3 percent compared with April 2011. The price drop was exactly the same as in the preceding months. Prices have declined almost continually since August 2010.
Nearly 10,000 existing residential property units changed hands in May, approximately as many as in May 2010. Fewer flats were sold, but the number of single-family dwellings sold in May was higher than twelve months previously. Within the last category, the number of detached houses increased most (by nearly 11 percent).

Housing prices / source: www.cbs.nl

Today the Economic bureau of ING Bank published its monthly “Housing news” on the Dutch housing market. Here are the pertinent snips (translated to English):
Trust in housing market declines
The trust of (potential) starters and homeowners in the Dutch housing market declined for the 2nd quarter in a row. In Q2, 2011 the ING Housing index was rated 93, a drop of 5 points compared to Q1. This means there are more bears than bulls among starters and homeowners. The drop of the ING Housing index is caused by the expectance that housing prices will drop and less houses will be sold.

The number of starters that considers this moment as favorable for purchasing a house decreases. Also starters are worried more whether they can afford private housing. In the meantime, 54% is worried about this.

Owners of private housing think it will be less easy to sell their house. Only 27% thinks it will be easy to sell their house, against 36% in Q1.
I have nothing to add on this grim news on the Dutch housing market

Once again: The Golden Doughnut

The golden doughnut (for ideas that have clearly a hole in it) goes today to Professor Peter Boelhouwer of the University of Technics in Delft for being totally clueless on the necessary medicine for the Dutch housing market.

His idea of a medicine was:
  • Again increasing the amount of credit that starters can borrow on their mortgage and that brought so many starters into trouble.
  • Loosening of the stricter rules for obtaining a mortgage by the Dutch banks and the Authority Financial Markets.
  • In general: back to 2007 when the sun was shining and everybody was happy on the housing market and housing prices were increasing for eternity.
  • And of course he doesn’t want to do anything about the Mortgage Interest Deduction (MID)
For this total ridiculous ideas, this clown earns a very well deserved Golden Doughnut. He gets it for wanting to reinstate the loose lending rules and loose awareness of risk that caused the Dutch housing bubble in the first place.

The Golden Doughnut

Blogoria.de

Blogarchief