Search This Blog

Saturday, 17 October 2015

“Three shades of Depression!” Must the world prepare for a devastating third leg of the vast, enduring economic crisis, striking the world since 2008, before there is light at the end of the tunnel?

“This economic crisis that started in 2008 is like an Amazing Discoveries infomercial from the late eighties; it seems to last forever and there is always more on offer than you have bargained for!”
Ernst Labruyère - 2015

Although very few people dare to call this vast economic crisis for what it is, it is becoming perfectly clear that we are in the midst of a heavy depression.

A depression that is here to stay for years to come; perhaps even unless something really dramatic happens, like a war or a world-altering new invention. And when we see how the moods are deteriorating globally at this very moment, a devastating war seems a realistic possibility, unfortunately.

“But”, you could argue,”it seems that the Dutch economy is currently going through a revival  with rising housing prices, increased producer and consumer confidence, seemingly ubiquitous economic growth and a general rise in imports and exports. And the European Union as a whole is doing fine at this moment, isn’t it?!”

Yes, you are more or less right. Yet, it took seven years of waiting, a vessel-load of additional money and liquidity in the financial markets and near-zero interest rates from the ECB to achieve this "success".

And on October 15th, the Dutch Central Bureau of Statistics stated that the drop in unemployment and the rise in the number of jobs, which was a trademark of early 2015, came grindingly to a standstill in July and did not resume anymore until this date:

Early this year, the number of unemployed started to fall, but in the past three months the decline has come to a standstill. Statistics Netherlands (CBS) reports that 607 thousand people or 6.8 percent in the labour force were unemployed in September, i.e. the same amount as in July and August.

[...]

The number of people in paid work is about the same as in June. Until June, the working population had grown. The number of people working at least 12 hours a week increased, but the number of people working less than 12 hours a week decreased at the same rate.

The good news from the last snippet is that a part of the Dutch people has seemingly exchanged its limited-hour job for a job with more working hours. That is good news indeed for people with a small job, who desperately want to work longer hours. The bad news is, however, that the real growth has seemingly disappeared from the economy, when it comes to the rise in employment in The Netherlands.

And when the outlook for rising employment is not exactly great at this moment, but the Dutch people again run the risk of turning into ‘debt slaves’, due to the attractive, extremely low interest rates, steadily rising housing prices and (consequentely) increasing mortgage principals, this is also bad news, disguised as good news: nice for the people with an excess mortgage and an underwater house, but bad for the rest of the country, which has to borrow more money again in order to pay for their new house.

And now the inflation seems again heading for the gutter. Not only in The Netherlands, but all over Europe. 

Besides that: enly the slightest hint of higher interest rates or other dampening measures is enough to cause sheer panic at the financial markets. A few weeks ago, about one week of trading was all it took to blast the whole annual profits at the stock exchanges for 2015 to smithereens in The Netherlands and many other countries (see the charts in the bottom of this article). 

That the financial markets since then regained some of their profits for 2015, does not change anything at all about this worrisome fact. There is only stability on the markets, when bad news stays away; that is not real stability, isn’t it?

And how about the mood of the Dutch citizens?! Well, read this!

Last Wednesday, the Dutch Central Bureau of Statistics presented two tell-tale charts, accompanied by the statement that “the Dutch have more confidence in the European Union than in their own Second Chamber of Parliament”.

To grasp the real impact of this message, one has to remember that the Dutch confidence in the European Union is not exactly high: less than 40%!

Percentage of Dutch people with
confidence in national institutions
Source: www.cbs.nl
Click to enlarge

Percentage of Dutch people with
confidence in Second Chamber of Parliament
Source: www.cbs.nl
Click to enlarge

Again, these are depression-like figures and they have everything to do with the fact that people lost even the smallest bit of basic trust in their politicians and often just don´t feel represented by them anymore. And even though this has something to do with the credibility of the current generation of politicians (of course ), I personally consider this rather a ‘mood-thing'.

That is for the simple reason, that I fundamentally doubt whether the current generation of politicians is really worse than the previous generations. Probably not, which means that the reason for the people's distrust lies in the people themselves. People are simply depressed by the enduring economic hardship.

On top of that, one should not forget that the mounting tensions regarding the Syrian and Eritrean refugees within Europe - currently the hottest topic in the news - and especially The Netherlands are partially the result of a mood crisis. Of course there are real refugee crises within Italy, Greece, Hungary and Germany, and its logical that this leads to tensions within the population.

However, in The Netherlands there is already an ongoing refugee crisis without(!) an increased influx of refugees:
 
The percentual difference between the influx of refugees
between the first 7 months of 2014 and 2015
Data courtesy of flipvandyke.nl and Eurostat
Click to enlarge
Like this chart with Eurostat data shows, there have been real refugee crises in Hungary, Germany and perhaps Austria, while other countries also experienced strongly elevated inflows of refugees (although eventually still relatively small numbers remain for 2015; henceforth, I avoid the word crisis).

However, The Netherlands (orange row in the chart) had actually a decrease(!) in the number of refugees during the first seven months of 2015. So what is the political and societal fuzz about, in reality?! It is a lot about moods, overhere!

That is why I don’t think that the Dutch economy will start to structurally grow again, until people feel better in general or have something to collectively strive for and roll up their sleeves for. That will also be true for the rest of Europe, I think. And whether people feel better, due to a growing economy or an economy will grow due to people feeling better, is of course an endless chicken-and-egg discussion, although I tend to believe the latter.

And look at things from this perspective: when the whole Middle-East and North-Africa seem at war with each other, the tensions between Europe and Russia, as well as within the former Soviet Union, are mounting by the day, the American economy is faltering and the emerging markets are rather akin to imploding markets; what are the odds of the European Union and especially export-tiger The Netherlands of getting through this period unharmed?!

Besides that, is there another way to describe the Chinese economy than that it has been hit by Thor’s hammer?

The following snippets of the following very interesting article, about the depression-like outlook for the world economy, are from The Guardian:

The heart of the economic disorder is a world financial system that has gone rogue. Global banks now make profits to a extraordinary degree from doing business with each other. As a result, banking’s power to create money out of nothing has been taken to a whole new level. That banks create credit is nothing new; the system depends on the truth that not all depositors will want their money back simultaneously. So there is a tendency for some of the cash banks lend in one month to be redeposited by borrowers the following month: a part of this cash can be re-lent, again, in a third month – on top of existing lending capacity. Each lending cycle creates more credit, which is why lending has always been carefully regulated by national central banks to ensure loans will, in general, be repaid and sufficient capital reserves are held. .

The emergence of a global banking system means central banks are much less able to monitor and control what is going on. And because few countries now limit capital flows, in part because they want access to potential credit, cash generated out of nothing can be lent in countries where the economic prospects look superficially good. This provokes floods of credit, rather like the movements of refugees.

The false boom that follows seems to justify the lending. Property prices rise. Companies and households grow overconfident about their prospects and borrow freely. Economies surge well above their trend growth rates and all seems well until something – a collapse in property or commodity prices – unravels the whole process. The money floods out as quickly as it flooded in, leaving bust banks and governments desperately picking up the pieces.

Well, that article leaves little room for discussion, it seems.

And as a piece-the-resistance, I want to show some charts and tables, which show that the real, durable growth might yet be a thing of the (quite distant) future:

AEX Amsterdam Index, for 2015 Year to Date
Data courtesy of Bloomberg
Click to enlarge

CAC40 Paris Index, for 2015 Year to Date
Data courtesy of Bloomberg
Click to enlarge

DAX Frankfurt Index, for 2015 Year to Date
Data courtesy of Bloomberg
Click to enlarge

FTSE 100 London Index, for 2015 Year to Date
Data courtesy of Bloomberg
Click to enlarge

Hang Seng Hongkong Index, for 2015 Year to Date
Data courtesy of Bloomberg
Click to enlarge

Standard & Poor's 500 New York Index, for 2015 Year to Date
Data courtesy of Bloomberg
Click to enlarge

Shanghai Composite Index, for 2015 Year to Date
Data courtesy of Bloomberg
Click to enlarge

Price development agricultural 
commodities in 2015
Data courtesy of Bloomberg (?)
Click to enlarge

Price development precious metals in 2015
Data courtesy of Bloomberg (?)
Click to enlarge

Price development fuels in 2015
Data courtesy of Bloomberg (?)
Click to enlarge

Price development steel in 2015
Data courtesy of Bloomberg (?)
Click to enlarge


Price development crude oil in 2015
Data courtesy of Bloomberg (?)
Click to enlarge

What these charts showed, is that the ongoing third leg of the depression is an “all-inclusive” leg with virtually no exceptions... in any market and for any commodity. This third leg of the depression might point out to be a very serious new crisis.

Nevertheless, and to end on an optimistical note, there should be no reason for structural pessimism, according to one of the smartest people that I know, Kevin Depew of (formerly) Minyanville in a personal tweet:

This is the 3rd stage [of the crisis]. The Emerging Markets breakdown. [This is] Prelude to 1st stage of global growth. Best I can do. Long term.

Kevin Depew was the first to call the current crisis a depression... in 2008. He has been so right about that, in hindsight. 

So let us patiently wait, with Kevin's reluctant optimism as a guideline and not give up on the economy... and the world itself.

Sunday, 11 October 2015

Are the US ‘Republican Party’ a doomed party that urgently needs to reinvent itself, if it does not want to implode totally and leave the country in a governmental chaos that would put Belgium to shame?!

Yesterday, I heard at the news that the leading Republican candidate for the position of Speaker of the House of Representatives, Kevin McCarthy, voluntarily withdrew his candidacy. Even though he had a comfortable lead upon his adversaries, McCarthy decided to throw the towel.

Allegedly, the reason for McCarthy’s withdrawal was that he did not manage to get the full majority of the Grand Ole Party backing his candidacy. A radically conservative squadron in the House, closely affiliated  to the infamous Tea Party, demanded a much tougher opposition against the ongoing agenda of President Barrack Obama and judged the more moderate McCarthy as ‘being not fit for the job’.
Probably, McCarthy decided that he did not want to be a ‘lame duck’ speaker after his ballot and withdrew two days ago.

This event emphasized once more, how firm the grip of the extremely conservative and erratically religious Tea Party currently is on the Republican Party. This is something that never ceases to amaze the more secular Europeans and leaves them in ´shock and awe´.

How can it happen that arguably the most modern and economically forward country and global leader, the United States, is more and more sliding towards being the Christian pendant of a `fundamentalist nation´: utterly divided between modernty in the large cities at the East and West coast and the almost medieval habits and choices in the heartland of the nation?

A nation in which a very small part of the political caste is keeping the rest of their peers hostage with their policy of “demonizing their ’foes’  in the White House and in Washington as a whole, not listening to their allies and adversaries, not negotiating about anything and never deviating from their fundamentalist policies, which seem to be carved out in marble”.  The Tea Party seemingly stands “For God, Our Nation, Our Constitution, Mom’s Apple Pie and the Gun under our Cushion” and is arguably world record holder in its unworldly behaviour.

The effect of such popular and strong populist/extremist parties at the far ends of the political spectrum is always that they act as a magnet upon the more moderate political leaders,  with their success: `if you can´t beat them, join them... and if you really don´t want to join them, be as close to them as possible`.

For the Republicans, this unavoidable political behaviour turns cooperation with the Democrats, extremely necessary for the topics that really matter, into a mirage for the foreseeable future. Consequently, these effects and their consequences turn the nation more and more into an uncontrollable political monster.

And then there are the two most prominent Republican candidates for the next presidential elections, which will be held in November 2016: Donald Trump and Jeb ‘the brother of...’ Bush.  One is an extremely successful businessman, who wants to run the nation as one of his companies; the other is son and brother of two former American presidents and extremely rich businessmen and wants to claim his position in the political ‘family business’.

Although one cannot abnegate Donald Trump of being a smart and streetwise tough guy with undeniably a lot of pizazz and a “refreshing” lack of political correctness, the man is clearly an idiot, who started to believe in his own infallibility and greatness. A country is definitely not a large corporation and everybody who thinks it is, is going to do a lot of damage to the nation and especially to the rights and privileges of minorities. The fact that Trump really seems to have a chance next year is a tell-tale signal of the current sorry state of American politics.

And Jeb Bush? Well, what can we say about him from our position in remote Europe?! That he seems a smarter, but nevertheless much bleaker version of “George Dubya”?

A president, who made a travesty of his presidency and pushed the world in three terrible wars, of which the consequences last until this very day and probably much, much longer: the wars against Afghanistan and Iraq and ‘the war on terrorism’.

The combination of George W. Bush naivety(?), his undeserved trust in and loyalty to his advisors (a.o. Scooter Libby and Karl Rove) and fellow government-members (i.e. Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld), who mainly used the Iraq war as a cashcow for themselves (i.e. Halliburton, Blackwater), as well as his capability to tell the most gruesome lies with a face as if he believed his words himself, made him the epithomy of a dangerous leader.

By coincidence, Dutch television showed yesterday evening the movie ‘Fair Game’; this movie dealt with the betrayal against the former CIA Agent Valerie Plame  and former ambassador Howard Wilson, by former Chief of Staff of the President George W. Bush administration, Lewis ‘Scooter’ Libby and neoconservative spindoctor of President Bush, Karl Rove.

The happily married couple Plame (a covert CIA agent heavily involved in the Middle East) and Wilson (a former ambassodor with assignments in Gabon and Niger) had a devastating encounter with the White House´s advisors, after Howard Wilson refused to confirm the blatant lie of George Bush Jr et al,  that Saddam Hoessein had try to buy uranium (‘yellow cake’) in Niger, in order to create his much-desired nuclear bomb.

Scooter Libby and (probably) Karl Rove publically leaked the identity of Valerie Plame as a covert CIA agent, instantly ending her career, and tried to crush her and her husband Howard Wilson, when they justifiably denied the existence of WMD’s and production facilities for such weapons in Iraq.  

This supposed yellow-cake purchase order, as well as Iraq’s purchase of aluminium tubes – supposedly for the creation of nuclear ultra-centrifuges – in combination with Colin Powell’s Razzie Award-worthy home video  specially created for the United Nations, showing supposed ‘weapons of mass destruction’ storages and production facilities in Iraq, acted as the ‘smoking gun’ that triggered the war in Iraq.

However, all this evidence – except for the purchase of the aluminium tubes itself – had been rigged and were later confirmed as being utterly untrue. But then it was already too late. Iraq was conquered and left in the total and utter political chaos that it is in today, due to an endless series of stupid actions, perfidious political choices and almost criminal miscalculations. And so is the whole Middle East left in a chaos, as a matter of fact, partially as a consequence of this utterly stupid war.

While objectively all this says nothing about the presidential qualities of Jeb Bush, it is nevertheless worrisome that Jeb Bush is the best candidate (i.e. the candidate with the deepest pockets from a financial point of view) that the Republican party can come up with. Personally, I would state that ‘two times a Bush, is more than enough!’

And last, but not least there is always the most prominent member of the Tea Party, Sarah Palin, hanging as a black supercell cloud above the political landscape! Someone whose determination, political gutsiness and enormous influence is only surpassed by her dangerous stupidity and naivety.

Personally, I consider the Russian president Vladimir Putin as a ruthless, unscrupulous, corrupted and dangerous man, who is imperturbably following his own agenda for a new and great Russia and is willing to sacrifice a lot for his goals. Nevertheless, he is an intelligent and well-educated chess player, who bends the rules and plays tough, but undoubtedly knows where the point of no return lies that he should never pass. He is a battle-hardened professional, who will probably not scr*w up eventually.

However, when I look at some of the more ‘idealistic’, ideologically-driven and God-fearing members of the Republican party – like for instance the aforementioned Sarah Palin – I am not so sure that they will not push the world to the brink of a nuclear war, when push comes to shove. At times, these people act like a child with a loaded gun: nowhere near to comprehending what they are doing and what is at stake in (international) politics.

November will show another episode in the eternal soap around the US debt ceiling and the coming year will probably be full of raunchy and nearly lethal politics in the United States. Just like French strikers are willing to sacrifice their own future and the future of their company for their own goals, these Tea Party republicans – and probably some of the others too – are seemingly willing to sacrifice the wellbeing of their country and their people for their own political goals. That is a disturbing prospect. 

There is one tiny glimmer of hope that I have. That is that the more moderate and down-to-earth Republicans become so sick and tired of the erratic and dogmatic conceptions of the Tea Party squadron within their realm and of the Tea Party’s unwillingness to cooperate with the Democrats, that they decide to reform the party into a ‘Grand New Party’. That is the only way out of the political chaos and implosion that is seemingly looming in the United States, when the Republican Party does not find a way out of the political mess it created.

Wednesday, 7 October 2015

Is Ryanair that smart?! Or is Air France-KLM just that stupid?!

“Am I that smart?! Or are you just that stupid”

Louis van Gaal, the current head coach of Manchester United is a legendary trainer. Where already his achievements as a coach on the football field should have made him a legend, his long and troubled history with sports journalists is what really gave him fame/ notoriety.

And definetely the most famous quote in the eyes of the Dutch is the aforementioned outcry from 1996. It was uttered against two journalists, who did not want to understand his views and asked him impertinent questions – to the eyes of “beholder” Louis van Gaal, that is.

I had to think about this particular quote, when I learned today that two executive managers of Air France had to litterally run for their lives, after they announced involuntary mass lay-offs among the Air France personnel:

A scuffle broke out after demonstrators stormed a room at the group’s headquarters at Charles de Gaulle airport where Air France management was outlining 2,900 job cuts, or 5 per cent of total staff.

Xavier Broseta, head of human resources, had the shirt ripped from his back by an angry crowd as he made his way out. He was forced to climb a fence to escape, wearing only a pair of trousers and a tie.

“I could not believe it, they just started attacking,” said one person close to the unions, who was at the scene. “He looked really shocked as he was rushed out by security over a fence,” he said.

According to the same Financial Times article, the job cuts would apply to:
  • 300 pilots
  • 900 flight attendants
  • 1700 ground staff 

This is definitely terrible news for the employees of Air France to whom this news is applying, but one could hardly call it surprising news, after the events in recent years.

The mass lay-offs at Air France followed one month after the news that KLM – the Dutch subsidiary of Air France-KLM – could possibly be forced to lay off as much as 5000 people through involuntary lay-offs, after voluntary dismissals proved not to be sufficient anymore to make the Dutch AF-K subsidiary ‘lean and mean’ again. In other words: the message that Air France-KLM seems heading for some real bad weather in the near future could not be uttered more clear than with the current unrest in France and The Netherlands.

This very bad news about Air France-KLM is a blatant contradistinction with the soaring annual profits and the accompanying boasting of Ryanair. The following snippets came from Reuters:

Ryanair hiked its annual profit forecast by 25 percent on Wednesday after its summer performance was boosted by bad weather in northern Europe and the strength of the British pound.

The Irish airline, Europe's largest by international passenger numbers, said it now expects net profit for the 12 months through March 2016 to be between 1.175 billion euros ($1.3 billion) and 1.225 billion, up from an earlier forecast of 940 million to 970 million

And talking about ‘boasting’. In an interview with the German newspaper Welt am Sontag, Ryanairs chairman Michael O’Leary boasted that Ryanair is ‘planning to cut the prices in half’.

The following (translated) snippets were printed in Het Financieele Dagblad:

Chairman Michael O'Leary wants the consumer to profit from the lower oil prices. Earlier, the chairman promised the consumer already a “mother of all price wars”. In the German newspaper he gave a small peek at his hand of cards.

 O’Leary wants to increase Ryanair’s market share to 25% from the current 15%. This has to be achieved in 2025. [...] Ryanair’s attack plan accomodates a spectacular drop in ticket prices. ‘In the long run, we are aiming at a price of €0”, according to O’Leary in the interview. ‘We cannot put a term on that yet. Of course, there will be all kinds of additional expenses and surcharges for the consumer, outside the ticket price”.

And that’s that: Ryanair aims to make huge future profits by giving aways its tickets for free... but not really!

Enter the great Louis van Gaal;  in this case he could be personified by Michael O’Leary of Ryanair: “Are we that smart?! Or is the rest of the aviation industry and in particular Air France-KLM just that stupid?!” One can almost hear O’Leary think that.

Still, for me there is something extremely fishy about this blatant contrast between the slow demise of Air France-KLM at one hand and the unprecedented success stories of “class room bully” Ryanair and also long distance carriers like Turkish Airlines, Etihad and Emirates on the other hand.

Air France and KLM are decent airliners with a long, long history of safe flights, very good maintenance, good service on the ground and in the air and prices that are not particularly high anymore, even though they have never been among the cheapest airliners in the past.

Both airliners were traditionally among ‘the best of the breed’ and operated their core business in a quite decent and honest way. It could very well be that Air France and KLM are simply too decent and honest; they are perhaps outsmarted by their more seasoned competitors at both the low end and high end side of the aviation spectrum. 

As the Dutch say in one of their famous expressions, they could be “just too big for the napkin and too small for the table cloth”

Perhaps the main problem of Air France-KLM is that the other ‘teams’ in their line of business skim the edges of what is still decent behaviour among airliners and probably cut a few corners along the way.

Middle-Eastern airliners like Turkish Airlines, Etihad and Emirates have a reputation of (illegally) receiving billions in dollars in subsidies from their respective home countries. These are very rich and/or powerful countries, which see the aviation industry as a very good means to attract loads of tourists to the ‘pomp and circumstance’ in their ‘tinseltown’ cities, malls and hotels. Consequently they are willing to spend billions and billions in subsidies on behalf of their airliners and the airports which act as hubs for these airliners.

At the other end of the spectrum, there is obviously Ryanair; a company which has a reputation for flying with very low levels of fuel on international flights and which is also mentioned for hiring inexperienced or unemployed aviators, in order to fly for them at a bargain price, or perhaps even for free.

The company is also infamous among passengers for offering its customers an extremely low basic ticket price, but afterwards charging the customer with all kinds of peculiar surcharges and extra expenses for even the most basic services. This makes an initially very cheap ticket in the end not so cheap anymore, but then the customer has already booked and paid the ticket. 

And perhaps Ryanair’s biggest profit maker is the bedazzling number of seats that fits in a Ryanair 737-800; ideal for people who only look for the lowest ticket prices and don’t mind having virtually no space for their legs at all. And indeed: for short flights at a bargain price many people – including yours truly –are willing to abolish their need for some comfort and service on flights. Just like they don't mind standing on short trips by bus or train.

On top of that, there is one risk that every passenger should keep in mind, while flying: especially with the cheap airliners, which always try to save a few bucks on anything that they do. That is the substantial risk for excessive (and perhaps even dangerous) cost cuts on maintenance activities. Read here for instance the integral interview that I held with the distinguished aircraft engineer Fred Bruggeman in March of 2015.

This all leads to one simple conclusion: neither Air France-KLM nor its low-cost subsidiary Transavia can beat Ryanair on price with their current modus operandi. That is just impossible! They are simply not lean and mean enough!

All in all it seems that Air France-KLM is fighting a losing battle, when something does not change very quickly and dramatically in its way of doing business. And – except for the seemingly non-level playing field in the aviation industry – perhaps that something has also to do with the personnel numbers working at this company in distress and the salaries and remunerations that its personnel receives for doing their jobs. 

So, it can very well be that the aggressive outburst of especially the Air France personnel yesterday is yet another example of 'striking and protesting as French weapon of mass self-destruction', as I wrote in 2014.

Blogoria.de

Blogarchief